Methodology, audit-trail design, the work. Never more than monthly.
Service · Project-based engagement (specialist)
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that pass the PRISMA bar.
A proper meta-analysis is months of disciplined work: literature search registered, screening reproducible, effect sizes extracted by two independent coders, heterogeneity tested, publication bias assessed, narrative defensible. We do the work end-to-end, or we hand you a methodology playbook your team can run.
What you get
Pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO or equivalent) with search strategy, eligibility criteria, and analysis plan.
Systematic search across the relevant databases — PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL — with a PRISMA flow diagram.
Title/abstract + full-text screening performed by two independent reviewers with conflict resolution log.
Effect-size calculation, heterogeneity assessment (I², Q, τ²), forest plots, funnel plots.
Meta-regression and subgroup analysis where the data supports it.
Risk-of-bias assessment using the appropriate tool — ROB 2, Newcastle-Ottawa, MMAT — depending on your study designs.
Sensitivity analysis + publication bias tests (Egger's, trim-and-fill, leave-one-out).
Pricing
From
$5k
per project
Up to
$50k
larger scope
Engagements are scoped during the free 30-minute discovery call. You receive a fixed-price written proposal within 48 hours — no surprises after kickoff. Most projects sit between [$X,000 and $Y,000] depending on scope, with payment milestones tied to deliverables.
Final price always confirmed in a written quote before kickoff.
Ready to start
Add this engagement to your cart and check out — you'll still get the discovery call before any work begins.
Questions before you ask
More questions? Bring them to the discovery call — that's literally what it's for.
Next step
Manuscript-ready methods + results sections, fully PRISMA-compliant.
How it works
30-minute discovery call → protocol design (PRISMA, PROSPERO registration if needed) → search + screening sprint → extraction + analysis → manuscript-ready results section.
Best for
PhD candidates synthesising a body of literature; research groups producing systematic reviews; clinicians and policy teams quantifying intervention effects across studies.
Tech we work in
Principal credentials
Goals, timeline, current state — whatever helps us understand the work. Free 30-minute call follows; no commitment.